4. Belon, Rondelet, and Salviani, Their Contemporaries and Immediate Successors
p. 97-111
Texte intégral
1Better times came. A great movement had been aroused in the human spirit as early as the thirteenth century and in the fourteenth century by such people as Dante, Petrarch, and Boccaccio; the end of the fifteenth century was the moment of its maturity. Greeks fleeing from Constantinople had spread knowledge of the ancient classics of their nation1 and in particular had produced better translations of Aristotle;2 printing had been invented ;3 America had been discovered,4 and India was being colonized.5 Learning was reborn, and with it natural history, which at the same time saw an infinitely wider theater become open for research.
2Ichthyology was among the first to revive under these happy auspices. The first concern of those who were devoted to the science was to reexamine and explain the extant works of the ancients; in those initial moments, it was there that one hoped to find truth.
3At the beginning of the sixteenth century, Massaria attempted to comment on Pliny’s book 9.6 The eloquent Italian historian Giovio, in a work on the subject, took the trouble to research the ancient names of Roman fishes.7 He described forty-two species, approximately in order of size, and included in the accounts some characteristics that even today are not without interest for naturalists.
4Gilles8 proposed to do the same in his Traité des noms français et latins des poissons de Marseille. His articles are shorter but more numerous. He spoke of ninety-three fishes and sometimes had rather good solutions for ancient nomenclature. Moreover, the same author elsewhere rendered a real service in translating Aelianus, putting him in better order and including excerpts from some other authors, which, although still less than perfect, makes the study less tedious.9 Books 11, 12, and 13 are about fishes. Assembled under each name are the various articles relating to it, which had been scattered about in Aelianus and elsewhere. But because Gilles does not give citations, one cannot readily go back to the sources.
5The same virtue and the same fault are to be found in the book by Edward Wotton,10 De differentiis animalium. Using characteristics borrowed from the ancients, the author put them in order and wrote in a uniform style; in a word, he made one book, but he does not cite his sources or does so only here and there. His book 8 is on fishes, but it seems to contain nothing new.
6Lonicer,11 who included some pages on fishes in his Naturalis historiae opus novum of 1551, has not even the advantage of having made a good copy of the ancients; his translations of names into modern languages are faulty and his drawings fanciful.
7But the three great authors who truly founded modern ichthyology appeared in the middle of the sixteenth century and, what is remarkable, almost at the same time: Belon in 1553, Rondelet in 1554 and 1555, and Salviani from 1354 to 1558. All three, contrary to the compilers who fill our list after Aristotle and Theophrastus, personally saw and examined the fishes they spoke of and saw to it that they were drawn with some exactitude; and yet, too faithful to the spirit of their time, they applied themselves more to finding the names of these fishes in antiquity and composing their natural history from fragments taken from the authors where they believed they had found these names than to describing the fishes in a clear and complete manner, so that were it not for their drawings it would be almost as difficult to determine their species as those of the ancients.
8Belon’s12 drawings are the least helpful among those of the three authors, but his conjectures are not necessarily so; because he had traveled in Turkey and Egypt, his writings shed light on nomenclature in use today in the Archipelago, which sometimes aids us in retrieving the nomenclature used by the ancient Greeks. In his De aquatilibus, libri duo, he provided drawings of 110 species of fishes, including 22 cartilaginous species and 17 freshwater species, the rest being marine species; and he discussed about 20 other species for which he gives no drawings [see Table 1]. Most of these drawings are recognizable, although roughly drawn. Nearly all the marine fishes are Mediterranean, but there are also some species from the Paris market. Some of the drawings are reproduced in his short treatise Estranges poissons de marins [1551], and in his Observations [1553b] he added a drawing of a fish he believed to be the parrotfish (scare) of the ancients, which no one has seen again since his time.13
9The drawings by Salviani,14 not so numerous but much finer, are copperplate engravings on a rather large scale; some have not been surpassed in more recent works. They number ninety-nine; almost all are of fishes of Italy with some from Illyria and the Archipelago, not counting a few mollusks.
10Rondelet15 is superior to the other two authors in the number of fishes he knew, and even though his drawings, which are wood engravings, do not compare with Salviani’s for beauty, they have greater accuracy and are especially remarkable for their characteristic details. The artist who drew them was assuredly one of the most useful men in ichthyology, and it is regrettable that we do not know his name.16 There are 197 drawings of marine fishes and 47 fresh water, not counting cetaceans, reptiles, and mollusks. No one before Risso knew Mediterranean fishes as well as Rondelet, and even today it would be impossible to give a natural history of these fishes that would be the least bit complete without consulting him. The reader will see in the course of our work more than one species that Rondelet already knew and that we have been the first to find again. He also often provided observations on their anatomy, which we have been able to verify. Without exactly having a method in the accepted sense of the word today, it can be seen that he had a true sense of genera; he grouped several species with fair accuracy: drums (sciènes), wrasses (labres), blennies (blennies), herrings (clupes), mackerels (scombres), jacks (centronotes), mullets (muges), codfishes (gades), gurnards (trigles), flatfishes (pleuronectes), rays (raies), sharks (squales), eels (murènes), minnows (cyprins), and trouts (truites) are all grouped in his book in such a way that Willughby, and Artedi and Linnaeus after him, had little difficulty in making true genera of them.

Hippolyte Salviani
Frontispiece of Salviani’s Aquatilium animalium historiae (1554-1558).
Cliché Bibliothèque centrale, MNHN

“Des poissons plats…”
Introductory page of book 11 of Guillaume Rondelet’s Histoire entière des poissons (1558), part. 1, p. 245.
Cliché Bibliothèque centrale, MNHN
11When these three works were published, Gessner17 was engaged in the part of his great Historiae animalium that deals with aquatic animals. Instead of following the excellent plan he used in the two preceding parts —namely, arranging under certain rubrics the passages of authors from all the ages concerning each species— he inserted articles by Belon and Rondelet, and several by Salviani, as these articles appeared in their books, adding under the heading “Corollary” the passages they had not cited. Such a procedure made this part of his compilation much less useful, because one cannot discern what the ancients said except through the ideas and methods of these moderns. On the other hand, Gessner added to their illustrations, which he copied, along with many other illustrations and articles on the fishes of Venice, England, and Germany, which he himself had observed or about which his friends had sent him information. The number of illustrations in the first edition is more than seven hundred, but this includes cetaceans, mollusks, and in general everything that lives in water. There is no attempt at method, and everything is in alphabetical order. Nevertheless, during the rest of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, and even part of the eighteenth century, Gessner was the chief authority on all vertebrate animals.
12With regard to fishes in particular, Aldrovandi18 and his editor Uterverius hardly did anything but abridge the work of Gessner, reduce it to their own plan, and add to the illustrations they took from it a certain number of new illustrations, among which are in fact several made after nature and that still have some value, although roughly engraved in wood. Most of the species came from Italian seas, but there are also some from distant countries that were becoming better known.
13In fact, discoveries were continuing in the two Indies; colonies were being established there; stories were written that aroused curiosity about the singular natural phenomena to be seen there; scholars formed cabinets and gathered specimens to study at leisure. Little by little, in diverse works there appeared descriptions and drawings, and fishes were not always neglected in these works. Thus André Thevet,19 in his Singularitez de la France antarctique, wrote about the armored catfish (callichte) and the hammerhead shark (marteau). Léry20 named several Brazilian fishes, and his nomenclature often agrees with that which Marcgrave used almost a hundred years later. Clusius,21 in his Exotica, made reference to a chimaera (chimère), several species of porcupinefishes (diodons), a species of boxfishes (ostracion), and a triggerfish (baliste). De Laet,22 in his description of the New World, illustrated a cutlassfish (trichiure), a frogfish (chironecte), a pompano (gal), and other fishes. Nieremberg23 collected part of the writings of these authors in his Historia naturae but also included some accounts taken from manuscript sources.

“Rana piscatricis”
[= monkfish, Lophius piscatorius Linnaeus, 1758]. Plate from Conrad Gessner’s Historiae animalium liber IIII (1558), p. 119.
Cliché Bibliothèque centrale, MNHN

A parrot fish
Plate from Aldrovandi’s De piscibus libri V, et de cetis liber unus (1638), p. 8.
Cliché T. W. Pietsch collection
14Something else happened at this time that was most favorable to science: the masters of the new conquests, wishing to know the exact extent of their wealth, sent men of ability to study and describe it. Hernández in Mexico, at the order of Philip II, made a collection of drawings, with explanations, that would have been of great interest had it been published straightway; but only an excerpt has appeared, years after it was composed, with commentaries that were more perplexing than enlightening ;24 he touched on fishes only briefly and in a very abbreviated manner.
15The Dutch achieved in 1637-1638, under the leadership of Johann Mauritz, count of Nassau-Siegen, the conquest of northern Brazil. Willem Piso, the count’s physician, charged with examining the natural production of the country as it related to public health, had the good fortune of being assisted in this work by a young Saxon medical student, Georg Marcgrave.25 Of all those who described the natural history of distant lands in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, he was assuredly the most intelligent and the most exact, and the one who contributed most to the natural history of fishes. He made known a hundred of them, all new to science at that time, and gave descriptions much superior to those of all the authors who preceded him. The drawings are quite recognizable, despite the fact that they are simple wood engravings; and when some of them were reproduced in Bloch’s magnificent work, they were not always reproduced so faithfully. It is here that one sees for the first time the batfish (malthée; Lophius vespertilio Linnaeus), the squirrelfish (holocentrum), the cornetfish (fistulaire), the bagrid catfish (bagres), the guitarfish (rhinobate), the driftfish (pasteur), the bonefish (glossodonte), many characins (characins), the trahira (érythrinus), the armored catfish (loricaire), the naked-back knifefish (carape), the sailfish (istiophore), the threadfin (polyneme), the toadfish (batrachus), and the tarpon (megalope), not to mention a multitude of interesting species belonging to genera already known. Piso, in his second edition,26 added some figures to these, but drawn by another hand and much less accurate.
16Conquerors of the Portuguese in the East Indies as in Brazil, the Dutch sent their naturalists there too. Bontius27 was the first to publish on the fishes of Batavia, but with less precision and with less exact drawings than Marcgrave did for Brazil. Nieuhof28 added accounts of some species, but only a few.
17Becoming solidly established only later in America, it was not until the end of the seventeenth century that the French wrote about the natural history of that part of the world. Du Tertre29 actually borrowed most of his illustrations from Marcgrave, and Rochefort30 copied his from du Tertre. Notwithstanding, du Tertre provided valuable observations on some of the species.

Johan Nieuhof
Frontispiece from Awnsham Churchill & John Churchill’s, Mr. Johan Nieuhoff’s remarkable voyage & travells into ye best provinces of ye West and East Indies (1732).
18Meanwhile, this abundance of foreign natural production did not cause that of Europe to be neglected; on the contrary, it drew new attention to it. Mattioli,31 in the last editions of his Commentaire sur Dioscoride, added accounts of some fishes to those of Gessner and his three predecessors. Imperato32 mentioned two or three Mediterranean species. Columna33 and Scilla34 occasionally described two or three others. Schwenckfelt35 published a catalog and short descriptions of the fishes of Silesia. Schonevelde36 composed a fairly exact natural history of the fishes of Holstein and added some species to those Gessner had described. Toward the end of the seventeenth century, Sibbald37 described some fishes of Scotland. Neucrantz38 wrote a special treatise on the herring (hareng) in which different small species of the same genus are also mentioned.
Notes de bas de page
1 After the fall of Constantinople in 1453, and even before, during the wars and calamities that preceded that event.
2 The translation of [Aristotle’s] books on animals by Theodorus of Gaza — [born c. 1400] a Greek from Thessalonica who went to Italy in 1430 and died c. 1475— appeared for the first time at Venice in 1476.
3 Shortly before 1460.
4 In 1492.
5 [The early European settlement of India began with the Portuguese expedition of Vasco da Gama (c. 1460-1524) who left Lisbon in 1497 and, rounding the Cape of Good Hope, reached the city of Calicut in May 1498.]
6 Franciscus Massaria, In nonum Plinii de naturali historia librum castigations et annotationes, Basle, 1537, in quarto. There is also an edition of Paris, Vascosan, 1542, in quarto, which contains the ninth and the thirty-second books of Pliny.
7 Paolo Giovio [bishop of Nocera], born at Como in 1483, died at Florence in 1552, is well known as one of the most elegant Italian writers. His first work, not so famous as the others, is a Latin treatise on fishes: De Romanis piscibus libellus ad Ludovicum Borbonium, cardinalem amplissimum, Rome, 1524, in folio, and 1527 in octavo. There is an Italian translation by [Carlo] Zancaruolo, Venice, 1560, in octavo.
8 Pierre Gilles or Gyllius was born at Alby in 1490, traveled in Italy, and was sent to the Levant by Francis I. Obliged for lack of support to join the army of Soliman II, he bought his way out again, returned by way of Hungary and Germany, and died in Rome at the house of the cardinal d’Armagnac in 1555. His little treatise De Gallicis et Latinis nominibus piscium Massiliensium was written before his travels to the Levant and was [first] printed in 1533 [as a summary chapter to his excerpts from Aelianus].
9 This is the book mentioned above [note 8]: Ex Aeliani historia per Petrum Gyllium Latini facti, itemque ex Porphyrio, Heliodoro, Oppiano, turn eodem Gyllio luculentis accessionibus aucti, libri XVI, de vi et natura animalium, Lyons, Gryphe, 1533 and 1535, in quarto.
10 Edward Wotton, physician at Oxford, lived in the first half of the sixteenth century [1492-1555]. His book, titled De differentiis animalium libri decem and dedicated to the young King Edward VI, was printed in Paris by Vascosan in 1552, one volume in folio. It is remarkable for its typography.
11 Adam Lonicer [1528-1586], Naturalis historiae opus novum, in quo tractatur de natura et viribus arborum fruticum, herbarum, animantium’q; terrestrium, volatilium et aquatilium, Frankfurt, 1551, in folio. [His chapter on fishes, titled “De Piscium natura,” within which he includes accounts of crustaceans, mollusks, and cetaceans, is found on pp. 300-309.]
12 Pierre Belon, born in the county (comté) of Maine in 1517, studied in Germany under Valerius Cordus, traveled in Italy and throughout the Levant, and returned to Paris in 1550. Charles IX lodged him in the château of Madrid in the Bois de Boulogne, and there he was occupied in translating Dioscorides when he was assassinated in the Bois on his way to Paris in 1564. In ichthyology, we have his Histoire naturelle des estranges poissons marins, avec la vraie peincture et description du daulphin, et de plusieurs autres de son espèce, Paris, 1551, in quarto; De aquatilibus, libri duo, Paris, 1553, in octavo oblong; a French translation of the same work, under the title La Nature et diversité des poissons, avec leurs pourtraicts, representez au plus près du naturel, Paris, 1555, in octavo oblong. His Observations de plusieurs singularitez et choses mémorables, trouvées en Grèce, Asie, Judée, Égypte, Arabie, etc., Paris, 1553, 1554, and 1555, in quarto, also contains divers articles on fishes. [For more on Belon, see Gudger (Eugene Willis), “The five great naturalists of the sixteenth century, Belon, Rondelet, Salviani, Gesner and Aldrovandi: A chapter in the history of ichthyology,” Isis, vol. 22, no. 1, 1934, pp. 26-28; Cole (Francis Joseph), A history of comparative anatomy: from Aristotle to the eighteenth century, London: Macmillan, 1949, pp. 60-62; Allen (Elsa Guerdrum), “The history of American ornithology before Audubon,” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, new series, vol. 41, no. 3, 1951, pp. 410-412.]
13 Lacepède later described it [this “parrotfish,” among the wrasses] under the name Cheiline scare [Cheilinus scarus; see Lacepède (Bernard Germain Étienne), Histoire naturelle des poissons, Paris: Plassan, 1801, vol. 3, p. 530].
14 Hippolyte Salviani, from Città di Castello, 1514-1572, physician to Cardinal Cervin, who was pope for six weeks under the name Marcellus II, as well as to his successor Pope Julius III, published his Aquatilium animalium historiae, in folio, from 1554 to 1558; it was reprinted in Venice in 1600 and 1602. [I have been unable to locate copies of the latter two editions; for more on Salviani, see Gudger (Eugene Willis), “The five great naturalists of the sixteenth century, Belon, Rondelet, Salviani, Gesner and Aldrovandi: A chapter in the history of ichthyology,” Isis, vol. 22, no. 1, 1934, pp. 30-32.]
15 Guillaume Rondelet, born at Montpellier in 1507, son of a pharmacist, was named professor in that town in 1545, traveled with cardinal de Tournon in France, Italy, and the Netherlands, returned to Montpellier in 1551, and died in 1566. He was assisted in the composition of his book on fishes by Guillaume Pellicier, bishop of that town. The first part, Libri de piscibus marinis, appeared in Lyons in 1554, in folio. It is divided into eighteen books: the first four treat of generalities; the fifth through the fifteenth describe the different fishes; the sixteenth, cetaceans, turtles, and seals; the seventeenth, mollusks; the eighteenth, crustaceans. The second part, Universae aquatilium historiae, is dated 1555 and comprises two books on testaceous species, one book on worms (vers) and zoophytes, three books on freshwater fishes, and one on amphibians. There is an abridged French translation of this work, Lyons, 1558, in quarto, titled L’Histoire entière des poissons, by Guillaume Rondelet, Esq., etc. [For more on Rondelet, see Gudger (Eugene Willis), “The five great naturalists of the sixteenth century, Belon, Rondelet, Salviani, Gesner and Aldrovandi: A chapter in the history of ichthyology,” Isis, vol. 22, no. 1, 1934, pp. 28-30; Oppenheimer (Jane Marion), “Guillaume Rondelet,” Bulletin of the history of medicine, vol. 4, 1936, pp. 817-834; Cole (Francis Joseph), A history of comparative anatomy: from Aristotle to the eighteenth century, London: Macmillan, 1949, pp. 62-72.]
16 [According to Nissen (Nissen (Claus), Schöne Fischbuch: Kurze Geschichte der ichthyologischen Illustration, Stuttgart: Lothar Hempe, 1951, p. 83; Die Zoologisches Buchillustration. Ihre Bibliographic und Geschichte, vol. 2, pt. 2: Geschichte der zoologischen Buchillustration, Stuttgart: Anton Hiersemann, 1972, p. 115; see also Baudrier (Henri Louis), Bibliographie Lyonnaise: recherches sur les imprimeurs, libraires, relieurs et fondeurs de lettres de Lyon au XVIe siècle [publiées et continuées par Baudrier Julien], Paris: F. de Nobele, 1964, vol. 2, p. 172), Rondelet’s artist was Georges Reverdi, an “engraver preferred by publishers” at Lyons, born in the region of Dombes in eastern France and active from about 1529, when he worked in Italy, to about 1560 at Lyons. In preparing the woodcuts that illustrate Rondelet’s book, Reverdi is said to have worked directly from the author’s drawings (Bauchot Marie-Louise, pers. comm., 7 September 1993; see also Kolb (Katharina), Guillaume Rondelet et les “Libri de piscibus,” Mémoire Maîtrise Histoire de l’Art (Université de Paris IV, Sorbonne), 1992, vol. 1, pp. 182-187).]
17 Conrad Gessner, the most knowledgeable naturalist of the sixteenth century, born in Zurich in 1516, died in 1565, among a multitude of other works has left us a great monument in his Historiae animalium [1551-1587], printed in Zurich in five books that are usually bound in three volumes in folio. The fourth book, which treats of aquatic animals and is the largest of these volumes —Historiae animalium liber IV, qui est De piscium et aquatilium animantium natura— appeared in 1558. An edition not so handsome but more complete was printed at Frankfurt in 1604; another appeared in 1620, as well as an abridgment titled Nomenclator aquatilium animantium, Zurich, 1560, with the same figures. [For more on Gessner, see Gudger (Eugene Willis), “The five great naturalists of the sixteenth century, Belon, Rondelet, Salviani, Gesner and Aldrovandi: A chapter in the history of ichthyology,” Isis, vol. 22, no. 1, 1934, pp. 32-36; Allen (Elsa Guerdrum), “The history of American ornithology before Audubon,” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, new series, vol. 41, no. 3, 1951, pp. 402-403; Wellisch (Hans H.), “Conrad Gessner: A bio-bibliography,” Journal of the Society for the Bibliography of Natural History, vol. 7, no. 2, 1975, pp. 151-247; Adler (Kraig) (ed.), Contributions to the history of herpetology, Oxford (Ohio): Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, 1989, pp. 7-8.]
18 Ulisse Aldrovandi, born at Bologna in 1522 of a noble family that still survives, spent his life and fortune in assembling the materials for his great natural history, in thirteen folio volumes [published in Bologna between 1599 and 1688], only four of which he himself published, namely, three on birds [1599-1603] and one on insects [1602]. He died in 1605, at the age of eighty-three. The volume on fishes and cetaceans, drawn up in part from his notes by his successor at Bologna, [Johannes] Cornelius Uterverius, was not published until 1613, but it was reprinted at Bologna in 1638 and 1644 and at Frankfurt in 1623, 1629, and 1640. [For more on Aldrovandi, see Gudger (Eugene Willis), “The five great naturalists of the sixteenth century, Belon, Rondelet, Salviani, Gesner and Aldrovandi: A chapter in the history of ichthyology,” Isis, vol. 22, no. 1, 1934, pp. 36-38; Allen (Elsa Guerdrum), “The history of American ornithology before Audubon,” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, new series, vol. 41, no. 3, 1951, pp. 403-405.]
19 André Thevet [1502-1590], a friar, native of Angoulême, who accompanied [Pierre] Gilles [see note 8 above] on his journey to Greece in 1550, was with [Nicolas Durand de] Villegaignon [1510-1571] on his expedition to Brazil in 1555 and published his observations at Anvers in 1558, a small book in octavo, with woodcuts. In it he speaks of only two or three fishes [e.g., see his pp. 158-160].
20 Jean de Léry, from La Margalle near Saint-Seine in Burgundy, a protestant minister, born in 1536 [died 1613], went to Brazil in 1556 at the request of Villegaignon. He published the account of his journey [said to contain the earliest descriptions of Brazilian fishes; see Dean (Bashford), Bibliography of fishes, vol. 3, New York: Published by the American Museum of Natural History, 1923, p. 275] at La Rochelle in 1578, in octavo. It was reprinted several times [at Rouen, Paris, Geneva, etc.] and has been included in different collections. Chapter 12 of the book [pp. 185-193] treats of fishes and is not without interest. There are no figures.
21 Charles de l’Écluse (in Latin Carolus Clusius), botanist, born at Arras in 1526, was director of the gardens for emperors Maximilian II and Rudolph II; he died in 1609 while professor at Leiden. The book in question, titled Caroli Clusii exoticorum libri X, appeared in Anvers in 1605, one volume in folio.
22 Johannes de Laet, born at Antwerp in 1581, died in 1649, director of the Dutch West India Company, great promoter of geography, editor of Marcgrave [see note 25 below], and so on, is the author of several works, among them especially his Novus orbis, seu Descriptionis Indiae occidentalis, Leiden, 1633, one volume in folio. On pages 570-574 is a chapter titled “Pisces marini Brasiliensium” [in which he provides descriptions of some two dozen species and figures of five species. A hammerhead shark is described and illustrated on p. 576].
23 Juan Eusebio Nieremberg, a Jesuit born in Madrid in 1595 of a family originally from the Tyrol, died in 1658, wrote numerous works. His Historia naturae, maxime peregrinae, libri XVI, appeared at Anvers in 1635, in folio. It is a compilation in a pedantic style that does not proclaim its author as having any knowledge of the subject matter; however, it presents articles by authors then in manuscript form, such as Hernández [see note 24 below], and others; fishes are presented in the eleventh book.
24 Francisco Hernández de Toledo [1514-1587], primary physician to Philip II of Spain [was sent to Mexico in 1570 to collect and explore]. He composed a natural history of that country, embellished with more than twelve hundred paintings of plants and animals. As happens only too often, this work, which cost 60,000 ducats to produce, remained in manuscript, and it is not known what has become of it. Francisco Ximénes [1560?-1620] produced an abridgment without the drawings in Mexico City in 1615, a small volume in quarto. An Italian named Nardo Antonio Recchi [died 1595], primary physician of the kingdom of Naples, made excerpts of it in ten books, which were acquired by the prince de Cesi [Federico Cesi duca di Acquasparta, 1585-1630] and published in Rome in 1651, in one volume in folio, under the title Rerum medicarum Novae Hispaniae thesaurus, seu Plantarum, animalium, mineralium Mexicanorum historia…, with many woodcuts, and with long commentaries by Joannes Terentius [1576-1630], physician at Constance, and Johannes Faber [1574-1629], physician at Bamberg, both of whom were established at Rome, and the famous Fabius Columna [1567-1640]. Even longer commentaries were added to certain illustrations of plants and animals that Recchi had left without description, several of them representing objects foreign to Mexico, even animals of Asia and Africa, which were presented as though they were American. The basis of the text of this part rests on oral assertions by a Capuchin friar named Grégoire de Bolivar, collected by Faber. At the end of the volume are six essays by Francisco Fernández, who can be none other than Francisco Hernández, which seem to me to be his own originals with regard to the animal and mineral kingdoms, originals from which Recchi excerpted his ninth and tenth books. When use is made of this bizarre compilation, it is well to ascertain the author of the article consulted; on the other hand, there is very little about fishes in it, and only in the fifth book are there the little essays said to be by Fernández.
25 Willem Piso [1611-1678] was sent to Brazil by the Dutch West India Company, directed by De Laet, to serve as physician under Count Johan Maurits of Nassau-Siegen [1604- 1679], who governed that country from January 1637 to May 1644, and at the same time to gather specimens of the country’s natural production. For this purpose, De Laet gave him two young German mathematicians and physicians as collaborators; Georg Marcgrave, born at Meissen in 1610, and Heinrich Cralitz. The latter promptly died, but Marcgrave survived the climate and described with care many of the plants and animals; at the same time, he made astronomical and physical observations of all sorts. He died on a voyage to Guinea in 1644. Piso received permission from Count Maurits to have Marcgrave’s papers entrusted to De Laet, and his work on natural history was published in Leiden in 1648 in folio, following an essay by Piso on medicine in Brazil, under the title Historia naturalis Brasiliae. Marcgrave’s work is divided into eight books; the fourth is on fishes. The descriptions are entirely his own, and De Laet only added a few notes. The illustrations are taken from two collections painted at the request of Count Maurits, which he lent to De Laet for the purpose. After returning from Brazil in 1644, Maurits entered the service of Brandenburg and was made governor of Wesel and grand master of the order of Saint John, and he was elevated to the rank of prince in 1654. He died in 1679, governor of Berlin. These two collections, one in oils and the other in gouache, were arranged by Dr. Christian Mentzel [1622-1701; physician to Friedrich Wilhelm I, elector of Brandenburg]. They were placed in the royal library of Berlin, where they are still kept [these eight hundred or so pictures of Brazilian plants and animals were removed from the Preussische Staatsbibliothek in Berlin during World War II and are at present housed at the Jagiellon Library, Cracow, Poland; see Whitehead (Peter James Palmer), “The treasures at Grüssau,” New Scientist, vol. 94, no. 1302, 1982, pp. 226-231; Whitehead (Peter James Palmer) & Boeseman (Marinus), A portrait of Dutch seventeenth century Brazil: Animals, plants and people by the artists of Johan Maurits of Nassau, New York: North-Holland pub. Co, 1989, pp. 22, 34-35]. The first collection, by an unknown artist, remained there almost unknown until 1811, when [Johann Carl Wilhelm] Illiger [1775-1813] consulted it to remove doubts raised by Marcgrave’s book [see Illiger (Johann Karl Wilhelm), Prodromus systematis mammalium et avium: additis terminis zoographicis utriusque classis, eorumque versione germanica, Berlin: C. Salfeld, 1811, p. vi]. The second collection, which some believe to be by Marcgrave and others by Maurits himself, was brought to the attention of the public by Schneider in 1786 [see chap. 10, note 10], and Bloch had several drawings copied from it for his great lchthyologie [1785- 1797], but without seeming to suspect that they were drawn by the prince, and worse yet, adding and deleting and otherwise changing several things quite arbitrarily. We can see, for example, that he has completely distorted the drawing of a squirrelfish (holocentrum) to create his Bodianus pentacanthus [see Bloch (Marcus Elieser), Ichthyologie, ou Histoire naturelle générale et particulière des poissons. Avec des figures enluminées, dessinées d’après nature [tr. de l’Allemand par Laveaux Jean-Charles], Berlin: François de La Garde, 1785-1797, 12 pts in 6 vols, vol. 4, pp. 40-42, pl. 225]. These details are taken from the preface to the third part of the great Naturgeschichte der auslandischen Fische by Bloch [1785-1795, vol. 3, pp. iii-x], and in particular from three articles by [Martin Heinrich Karl] Lichtenstein [see chap. 16, note 52], included among the memoirs of the Royal Academy of Sciences of Berlin [Lichtenstein (Martin Heinrich Carl), “Die Werke von Marcgrave und Piso über die Naturgeschichte brasiliens, erläutert aus den wieder aufgefundenen Originalzeichnungen. I. Säugethiere,” Abhandlungen der physikalischen Klasse der Königlich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften aus den Jahren 1814-1815, 1818, pp. 201-222; “Die Werke von Marcgrave und Piso über die Naturgeschichte brasiliens, erläutert aus den wieder aufgefundenen Original-Abbildungen. II. Vögel,” Abhandlungen der physikalischen Klasse der Königlich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften aus den Jahren 1816-1817, 1819, pp. 155-178; “Die Werke von Marcgrave und Piso über die Naturgeschichte brasiliens, erläutert aus den wieder aufgefundenen Original-Abbildungen (fortsetzung). III. Amphibien,” Abhandlungen der physikalischen Klasse der Königlich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften aus den Jahren 1820-1821, 1822, pp. 237-254; “Die Werke von Marcgrave und Piso über die Naturgeschichte brasiliens, erläutert aus den wieder aufgefundenen Original-Abbildungen (fortsetzung). IV. Fische,” Abhandlungen der physikalischen Klasse der Königlich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften aus den Jahren 1820-1821, 1822, pp. 267-288; see also Lichtenstein (Martin Heinrich Carl), “Die Werke von Marcgrave und Piso über die Naturgeschichte brasiliens, erläutert aus den wieder aufgefundenen Original-Abbildungen. IV. Fische [continued],” Abhandlungen der physikalischen Klasse der Königlich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften aus den Jahre 1826, 1829, pp. 49-65]; but we have been fortunate enough to confirm them in part with our own eyes. Valenciennes obtained permission from the conservators of the library to copy these collections, and we are today able to compare them with Bloch’s copies and with nature and definitively fix the genera and species to which each fish should be referred. [For more on Piso, see Pies (Eike), Willem Piso (1611-1678). Begründer der kolonialen Medizin und Leibarzt des Grafen Johann Moritz von Nassau-Siegen in Brasilien: Eine Biographie, Düsseldorf: Interma-Orb, 1981, 227 p., ills; Whitehead (Peter James Palmer) & Boeseman (Marinus), A portrait of Dutch seventeenth century Brazil: Animals, plants and people by the artists of Johan Maurits of Nassau, New York: North-Holland pub. Co, 1989, 359 p. + [1] pl., ills. On Maurits, see Boogaart (Ernst van den), Hoetink (Hans R.) & Whitehead (Peter James Palmer) (eds), Johan Maurits van Nassau-Siegen, 1604-1679, a humanist prince in Europe and Brazil, The Hague: Johan Maurits van Nassau Stichting, 1979, 538 p. + [17] pls, ills. On Marcgrave, see Gudger (Eugene Willis), “George Marcgrave, the first student of American natural history,” Popular Science Monthly, vol. 81, 1912, pp. 250- 274; Whitehead (Peter James Palmer), “Georg Markgraf and Brazilian zoology,” in Boogaart (Ernst van den), Hoetink (Hans R.) & Whitehead (Peter James Palmer) (eds), Johan Maurits van Nassau-Siegen, 1604-1679, a humanist prince in Europe and Brazil, The Hague: Johan Maurits van Nassau Stichting, 1979, pp. 424-471, Whitehead (Peter James Palmer), “The biography of Georg Marcgraf (1610- 1643/4) by his brother Christian, translated by James Petiver,” Journal of the Society for the Bibliography of Natural History, vol. 9, no. 3, 1979, pp. 301-314; Whitehead (Peter James Palmer) & Boeseman (Marinus), A portrait of Dutch seventeenth century Brazil: Animals, plants and people by the artists of Johan Maurits of Nassau, New York: North-Holland pub. Co, 1989, 359 p. + [1] pl., ills.] Marcgrave’s works on astronomy, the principal object of his studies, were not so fortunate. Entrusted to Golius [Jacobus Golius, born at The Hague in 1596, died at Leiden in 1667], they have never appeared. There is reason to believe that he preceded the abbé de La Caille [Nicolas Louis La Caille, 1713-1762] in determining many of the southern stars.
26 In 1658 Piso published a new, greatly enlarged edition of his essay on the medicine of Brazil, under the title De Indiae utriusque re naturali et medica. Marcgrave’s work, which in the original edition followed that of Piso, no longer appears in this new edition except in excerpts incorporated into the body of Piso’s work, and Piso added his own observations and several new illustrations; but he also deleted much, so that now the one book does not take the place of the other. [Despite this use of Marcgrave’s work], it is hard to see how some writers could accuse Piso of plagiarism. On the contrary, he acknowledged Marcgrave at every turn in his two editions.
27 Jacques Bondt or Jacobius Bontius [born 1592], physician at the city of Batavia in 1625, died in 1631, was the author of a treatise titled Historiae naturalis et medicae Indiae Orientalis libri VI. It was printed in 1658 along with Piso’s second edition, a circumstance that determined the title of that edition [see note 25 above]. The purely medical part had already appeared in 1645 with the treatise by Prosper Alpinus [1553-1617], De medicina Aegyptiorum.
28 Johan Nieuhof, born [in 1618] at Bentheim in Westphalia, employed in various capacities by the Companies [East and West] of the Dutch Indies, and for some time governor of Ceylon, perished at Madagascar in 1672. His book [published posthumously under the direction of his brother Hendrik] titled Gedenkwaerdige zee- en lant-reize door de voornaemste landschappen van West en Oostindien, Amsterdam, 1682, in folio, contains thirty-eight drawings of fishes, most of them interesting [see the original Dutch edition, Nieuhof (Johan), Gedenkwaerdige zee- en lant-reize door de voornaemste landschappen van West en Oostindien. Zee en lant-reize door verscheide gewesten van Oostindien, behelzende veele zeltzaame en wonderlijke voorvallen en geschiedenissen, Amsterdam: Jacob van Meurs, 1682, pt 2, pp. 268-281; or an English translation of Nieuhof ’s voyages compiled by Churchill (Awnsham) & Churchill (John), Mr. John Nieuhoff ’s remarkable voyage & travells into ye best provinces of ye West and East Indies. In their A collection of voyages and travels, some now first printed from original manuscripts, others now first published in English. In six volumes. With a general preface, giving an account of the progress of navigation, from its first beginning. Illustrated with a great number of useful maps and cuts, curiously engraven, London: J. Walthoe, 1732, pp. 305-311]; copies of them are found at the end of Willughby’s [1686] plates.
29 Jean Baptiste du Tertre, Dominican monk, missionary to the Antilles, born at Calais in 1610 [died at Paris in 1687], composed a general natural history of the Antilles. The first edition was published in 1654, in one volume in quarto; the second, 1667-1671, three volumes in quarto, is much more complete.
30 [Charles de] Rochefort [1605-1683], Protestant minister at Rotterdam, borrowed from Du Tertre’s first edition the greater part of his Histoire naturelle et morale des îles Antilles de l’Amérique, Rotterdam, 1658, in quarto.
31 Pietro Andrea Mattioli, born at Sienna in 1501, physician at Rome, Trent, Gorizia, and Prague successively, died [of the plague] at Trent in 1577, is famous for his commentary on Dioscorides, printed first in Italian at Venice in 1544 and 1548 [the “Privilegio” is dated 1544], and in Latin in 1554 and 1565. This last edition, by [Vincenzo] Valgrisi, is the best: there are very handsome woodcuts of fishes, some of which, however, are taken from Salviani and from Rondelet. This work has been translated and reprinted many times. [For more on Mattioli, see Zanobio (Bruno), “Pietro Andrea Mattioli,” in Dictionary of scientific biography, New York: Scribner’s, 1974, vol. 9, pp. 178-180.]
32 Ferrante Imperato [1550-1625], Neapolitan physician, author of a natural history in Italian almost entirely about chemistry and mineralogy, printed first in 1599 in folio, then in 1610 in quarto [I have been unable to locate a copy of the 1610 edition], and at Venice in 1672. It contains references to a remora (écheneis) and an oarfish (gymnètre).
33 Fabius Columna [Fabio Colonna], born at Naples in 1567, his father an illegitimate son of Cardinal Pompeo Colonna, died in 1640, provides a drawing of an eagle ray (mylobate) in his “Naturalium rerum observations,” 1606. His “De glossopetris dissertatio,” published in 1752, contains interesting details on the teeth of sharks (squales).
34 Shark (squale) teeth were also an object of study for the Sicilian painter Agostino Scilla [1629-1700], in his work on petrification titled La vana speculazione disingannata dal senso, Naples, 1670, a small volume in quarto, of which there is a Latin translation titled De corporibus marinus lapidescentibus, Rome, 1752, in quarto. It contains, in addition, an illustration of a hammerhead shark (marteau) and another of a rare species of shark (squale) with seven gill openings [see Scilla (Agostino), La vana speculazione disingannata dal senso. Lettera risponsiua circa i corpi marini, che petrificati si trouano in varij luoghi terrestri. Di Agostino Scilla pittore accademico della Fucina, detto lo Scolorito…, Naples: Andrea Colicchia, 1670, pl. 28].
35 Caspar Schwenckfelt [1563-1609], physician at Hirschberg, had a natural history of animals of Silesia printed at Lignitz in 1603 in quarto titled Theriotropheum Silesiae, filled with good observations but without illustrations. The fifth book [pp. 377-456] treats of fishes and indicates several species, all fresh water.
36 Stephan von Schonevelde [died 1632] was a physician at Hamburg. His Ichthyologia et nomenclaturae animalium marinorum, fluviatilium, lacustrium, quae in Florentissimis ducatibus Slesvici et Holsatiae [… occurrunt…], Hamburg, 1624, in quarto, is accompanied by seven plates in which several species then new are fairly well represented.
37 Robert Sibbald [1641-1722], physician at Edinburgh, worked for twenty years on his Scotia illustrata, sive Prodromus historiae naturalis, Edinburgh, 1684, one volume in folio, in which there are a few mediocre illustrations of fishes. He also published a capital work on cetaceans [Sibbald (Robert), Phalainologia nova; sive Observationes de rarioribus quibusdam balaenis in Scotiae littus nuper ejectis: in quibus, nuper conspectae balaenae per genera et species, secundum characteres ab ipsa natura impressos, distribuuntur, Edinburgh; London: Joannis Redi & Benjamin White, 1773, [4] + 105 + [3] p., 3 pls], but this has nothing to do with our subject.
38 De harengo, exercitatio medica, in qua principis piscium exquisitissima bonitas summaque gloria asserta et vindicata by Paul Neucrantz [1605-1671], physician at Rostock, published at Lubeck, 1654, in-4°.
Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence Licence OpenEdition Books. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.
Michel-Eugène Chevreul
Un savant, des couleurs !
Georges Roque, Bernard Bodo et Françoise Viénot (dir.)
1997
Le Muséum au premier siècle de son histoire
Claude Blanckaert, Claudine Cohen, Pietro Corsi et al. (dir.)
1997
Le Jardin d’utopie
L’Histoire naturelle en France de l’Ancien Régime à la Révolution
Emma C. Spary Claude Dabbak (trad.)
2005
Dans l’épaisseur du temps
Archéologues et géologues inventent la préhistoire
Arnaud Hurel et Noël Coye (dir.)
2011